Science 300: 745–746.īadii, Remo, and Antonio Politi. Prebiotic soup – Revisiting the Miller experiment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.īada, Jeffrey L., and Antonio Lazcano. Systems biology: Its practice and challenges. Philosophy of Science 6: 1–16.Īderem, Alan. In the first decade of the twenty-first century, benefiting from a growing awareness of the complexity of biological phenomena, the concept of emergence re-emerges as a way of characterizing life and its origin, not so much as an alternative to vitalism, but as an alternative to reductive explanations of life. The concept somehow re-emerged in the late twentieth century, especially as it became a central topic in philosophy of mind, and as it also received the unexpected support of the science of complex systems. The concept experienced a golden age that proved to be short lived as it encountered several scientific and philosophical setbacks in the mid-twentieth century. In the early twentieth century, the concept of emergence was strongly stimulated by the wish to formulate a philosophical alternative to both vitalism and mechanism. In each case, the whole is said to be more than the sum of its parts: a higher level of organization appears to exhibit properties that are claimed to be non-deducible, non-predictable or unexplainable on the basis of the properties of its lower level components. ![]() Since its early philosophical formulation in the nineteenth century, “emergence” has been applied to vital phenomena, but also to chemical compounds and mental states. ![]() In this contribution, I investigate the changes of focus in the philosophical concept of emergence in the nineteenth and twentieth century period, especially in connection with the problem of characterizing life and its origins.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |